(Figure: Monopoly Profits in Duopoly)

What assumption is part of the analysis illustrated by the model in the figure "Monopoly Profits in Duopoly"?

The correct option is D). the firms can act as a cartel and maximize their combined economic profit. The model assumes that the two firms can collude and act as a cartel, meaning they can cooperate to set prices and output levels in order to maximize their combined economic profit. This assumption forms the basis for the analysis illustrated by the model. By acting together as a cartel, the firms can restrict output, raise prices, and earn higher profits compared to a situation of competition. The model shows how collusion can lead to increased profits for both firms. However, in reality, collusion is often illegal or difficult to sustain, and firms may face incentives to cheat or engage in non-cooperative behavior, leading to different outcomes than those predicted by the model. The assumption that the firms can act as a cartel and maximize their combined economic profit is a crucial part of the analysis illustrated by the model. This assumption allows for the examination of the potential benefits of collusion and the impact it can have on industry profits.

Understanding the Assumption of Cartel Behavior in Economics

Cartel Behavior: In economics, a cartel refers to an agreement between competing firms to collectively control prices or output levels in order to maximize profits. This behavior can be highly profitable for the firms involved, as it allows them to operate as if they were a single monopoly in the market.

Benefits of Cartel Behavior:

One of the key benefits of cartel behavior is the ability to limit competition and increase prices above the competitive level. By coordinating their actions, firms can avoid price wars and maintain higher profit margins. In the case of the model illustrated by "Monopoly Profits in Duopoly," the assumption of cartel behavior allows for the exploration of how collusion can lead to increased profits for the firms involved. Legal and Practical Issues: While cartel behavior can be beneficial for the firms participating, it often raises legal and practical concerns. Many countries have antitrust laws that prohibit collusion and price-fixing among competitors. Additionally, maintaining cooperation among firms can be challenging, as there is always an incentive for individual firms to cheat and benefit at the expense of others. Impact on Industry: The ability of firms to act as a cartel and maximize their combined economic profit can have significant implications for the industry as a whole. Collusion can lead to higher prices for consumers, reduced innovation, and decreased efficiency in the market. On the other hand, it can also result in higher profits for the firms involved in the cartel. In conclusion, the assumption of cartel behavior is a fundamental aspect of economic analysis when studying the potential outcomes of collusion in markets. While the model may provide insights into how collusion can increase profits, it is essential to consider the legal, practical, and ethical implications of such behavior in the real world.
← Interest inflation and purchasing power analysis Reflecting on effective segmentation methods for a retailer selling beach apparel →