Defending Wayward Actions During Judah's Last Days

How did the people defend their wayward actions during Judah's last days?

The people during Judah's last days defended their wayward actions by employing various strategies such as rationalization, blaming external factors, denial, and a sense of entitlement or self-righteousness. These defense mechanisms allowed them to avoid personal responsibility and accountability for their misconduct amidst the corruption, idolatry, and moral decay in the Kingdom of Judah.

Rationalization

Rationalization: People in Judah's final days rationalized their actions by justifying them as necessary due to economic difficulties or political pressures. They convinced themselves that their actions were essential for their survival or to protect their interests, thereby minimizing the moral implications of their behavior.

Blaming External Factors

Blaming External Factors: Some individuals shifted the blame for their actions onto external factors such as corrupt leaders, a hostile environment, or societal norms. By portraying themselves as victims of circumstance, they aimed to avoid taking responsibility for their choices and behaviors.

Denial

Denial: Another defense mechanism used by the people was denial. They simply refused to acknowledge their wrongdoing or the harm they were causing to themselves and society. By denying the moral implications of their actions, they could continue to justify their behavior.

Entitlement and Self-Righteousness

Entitlement and Self-Righteousness: Some individuals felt entitled or self-righteous, believing that they were above reproach and that their actions were justified in pursuit of their goals or beliefs. This sense of superiority allowed them to maintain a facade of righteousness even in the face of societal collapse and moral decay. In essence, these defense mechanisms enabled individuals in Judah's last days to uphold their self-esteem and rationalize their wayward actions, despite the prevalent corruption and moral decline. They sought to justify their behavior through various means to evade personal accountability.
← Beethoven s conflict hero vs king Fanny mendelssohn hensel a prominent composer of lieder →